HUMOUR, HEGEMONY AND THE STRUGGLE FOR CONSCIOUSNESS: A GRAMSCIAN READING OF MILAN KUNDERA’S THE JOKE

Main Article Content

Tahmina Jarin Khanam

Abstract

The Joke was published in the dying years of Stalinist orthodoxy in Czechoslovakia, offering a wide range of irony, dark humor, and narrative polyphony to reveal how the dominant political structures control consciousness, force conformity, and punish dissent. The comic discourse and the political power intersect in Kundera's text, creating a fruitful ground for an analysis of ideology. This study examines the use of humor in the novel as a mode of communist resistance and as a means of diagnosis that illuminates the instability and coercive nature of communist hegemony in the context of the Cold War in Czechoslovakia, using Antonio Gramsci's theory of hegemony and struggle for cultural consciousness. The study is qualitative and employs textual analysis grounded in Gramscian cultural theory, supplemented by secondary theoretical frameworks from cultural materialism, literary sociology, and critical discourse analysis. The results show that the novel functions as both a tool of resistance and an indicator of ideological weakness. The ironic postcard the protagonist Ludvík writes is an unplanned yet significant gesture of counter-hegemonic speech, with an unequal impact that reveals the performative fragility of dominant ideological consent. The findings of this study suggest that Kundera's comic mode is a form of ‘war of position’ in which subaltern consciousness challenges hegemonic narratives at the level of everyday cultural life. Humor is no trivial matter but rather a place of struggle within hegemonic discourse, revealing its internal tensions and potentially generating other forms of feeling and collective memory.



JEL Classification Code: Z10, Z13, Z18.


Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section

Articles

Author Biography

Tahmina Jarin Khanam , Assistant Professor, Department of English, Varendra University, Rajshahi, Bangladesh

Tahmina Jarin Khanam is a faculty member in the Department of English at Varendra University, Rajshahi, Bangladesh. She holds academic expertise in English language and literature, with research interests encompassing literary studies, language teaching, cultural studies, gender studies, and contemporary literary criticism. She is actively engaged in teaching, research, and academic development activities, contributing to the advancement of English studies through scholarly publications and participation in academic forums.

How to Cite

Khanam , T. J. . (2026). HUMOUR, HEGEMONY AND THE STRUGGLE FOR CONSCIOUSNESS: A GRAMSCIAN READING OF MILAN KUNDERA’S THE JOKE. Journal of SUB, 16(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.63773/jsub.v16i1.20

References

Bakhtin, M. M. (1984). Rabelais and his world (H. Iswolsky, Trans.). Indiana University Press.

Beck, D., & Spencer, A. (2025). (Un)funny against all odds: The changing landscape of humour in politics. Alternatives, 50(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/03043754241290911

Browning, C. S., & Brassett, J. (2023). Anxiety, humour and (geo) politics: Warfare by other memes. International Relations, 37(1), 172–179. https://doi.org/10.1177/00471178231151561

Crehan, K. (2022). Why Gramsci? Dialectical Anthropology, 46(4), 507–520.

Critchley, S. (2002). On humour. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203870129

Filippini, M. (2017). Using Gramsci: A new approach (P. J. Barr, Trans.). Pluto Press. (Original Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks (Q. Hoare & G. Nowell-Smith, Eds. & Trans.). International Publishers.

Gramsci, A. (1971). The modern prince. Selections from the prison notebooks, 123–205.

Jukic, L. I. (2025). Central Europe: The death of a civilization and the life of an idea. Hurst Publishers.

Kuipers, G. (2015). Good humor, bad taste: A sociology of the Joke (2nd ed.). De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501510441

Kundera, M. (1992). The Joke (M. H. Heim, Trans.; A. Asher, Ed.). HarperCollins. (Original work published in 1967).

Lockyer, S., & Pickering, M. (Eds.). (2005). Beyond a joke: The limits of humour. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230236776

O’Brien, J. (1992). Milan Kundera: Meaning, play, and the role of the author. Critique: Studies in Contemporary Fiction, 34(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/00111619.1992.9935229

Petro, P. (Ed.). (1999). Critical essays on Milan Kundera. G.K. Hall & Co.

Pozzoni, M. C., & Quattromini, G. (2024). From folklore to conspiracy beliefs: A Gramscian approach to conspiracy theory studies. Genealogy, 8(4), 145.

Ricard, F., & Asher, A. (2003). Agnès's final afternoon: An essay on the work of Milan Kundera (A. Asher, Trans.). HarperCollins.

Sayer, D. (1998). The coasts of Bohemia: A Czech history. Princeton University Press.

Salem, S. (2021). Gramsci in the postcolony: Hegemony and anticolonialism in Nasserist Egypt. Theory, Culture & Society, 38(1), 79–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276420935178

Sotiris, P. (2020). Gramsci and Althusser encountering Machiavelli: Hegemony and/as new practice of politics. Jus Cogens, 3(2), 119–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42439-020-00030-1

Sotiris, P. (2022). Revisiting the passive revolution. Historical Materialism, 30(3), 3–45.

https://doi.org/10.1163/1569206X-20222352

Steiner, G. (1998). Language and silence: Essays on language, literature, and the inhuman. Yale University Press.

Woods, M. (2005). Milan Kundera and the art of translation. Translation Review, 69(1), 22–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/07350945.2005.11428236

Wang-Kaeding, H. (2025). Mediating hegemony through political humour: A discourse analysis of Spring Festival Gala sketches in China. East Asian Journal of Popular Culture, 11(1), 27–43.