THE POETIC SYNERGY: UNLEASHING EMOTION, IMAGINATION, AND THE PROFOUND INTERPLAY OF WORDSWORTH AND COLERIDGE

Main Article Content

Shelly Barua

Abstract

The creative partnership between William Wordsworth and Samuel Taylor Coleridge is pivotal to English Romanticism. Still, the current body of research has focused mainly on their poetry and theory, both of which are, in their own way, seen as individual accomplishments. Consequently, the dynamics of collaboration and subsequent estrangement have never been explored as a unified literary phenomenon. The current study fills this gap by discussing the role of the combination and contrast in developing central ideas of Romanticism. This paper aims to examine the Wordsworth-Coleridge collaboration as an intellectual relationship and to explore how their reimagined imagination, nature, human suffering, and supernaturalism are explored in Romantic poetry. The paper follows a qualitative comparative literary analysis methodology, using selected primary sources, including Lyrical Ballads, the Preface to Lyrical Ballads, and Biographia Literaria by Wordsworth and Coleridge, respectively. The results show that Wordsworth and Coleridge developed their own, yet interdependent, imaginative systems through long-term intellectual interaction. Wordsworth's ethical imagination anticipates experiential perception, moral sympathy, and nature as pedagogy. In contrast, Coleridge's supernatural imagination uses symbolic ambiguity and metaphysical questioning to explore the boundaries of ethics and knowledge. Their departure did not disintegrate cooperation but instead enhanced conceptual differentiation, turning intellectual polarization into a driving force. This research study makes contributions to the field of Romantic studies by developing a relational approach to literary formation that frames collaboration and estrangement as mutually constitutive. The study redefines poetic innovation as the product of dialogue, critique, and creative tension, and thus proposes a fresh perspective on the Romantic imagination as a field of negotiation and dynamic interaction.


JEL Classification Code: Z11, Z10, A12.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section

Articles

Author Biography

Shelly Barua , Assistant Professor, Department of English, Stamford University, Bangladesh

Shelly Barua is an Assistant Professor in the Department of English at Stamford University Bangladesh. She teaches courses in English language and literature and is actively engaged in academic research and pedagogy. Her academic interests include literary studies, language teaching, and critical analysis. She is committed to fostering students’ analytical thinking, communication skills, and appreciation of literature through innovative and student-centered teaching approaches.

How to Cite

Barua , S. . (2025). THE POETIC SYNERGY: UNLEASHING EMOTION, IMAGINATION, AND THE PROFOUND INTERPLAY OF WORDSWORTH AND COLERIDGE. Journal of SUB, 15(1), 32-37. https://doi.org/10.63773/ase2bv70

References

Abrams, P. A. (1993). Effect of increased productivity on the abundances of trophic levels. The American Naturalist, 141(3), 351-371.

Burkett, A. (2016). Chance in Darwinian Evolutionary Theory and British Romanticism. Literature Compass, 13(10), 663–669. https://doi.org/10.1111/lic3.12342

Chadha, S., & Mishra, P. (2024). Exploring Philosophical Expressions In The Writings of Samuel Taylor Coleridge: A Pioneer of Romantic Revival. eatp. https://doi.org/10.53555/kuey.v30i5.4542

Duff, D. (2020). The Romantic Ode and the Art of Brinkmanship. Études Anglaises, 73(2), 137-158. https://doi.org/10.3917/etan.732.0137

Hurtado, R. (1997). The English Romantic Poets. International Area Review, 1(1), 190-201. https://doi.org/10.1177/223386599700100112

Hutchings, K. (2007). Ecocriticism in British Romantic Studies. Literature Compass, 4(1), 172–202. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-4113.2006.00417.x

Hutchings, K., & Matthews, C. (2008). Teaching & Learning Guide for: Ecocriticism in British Romantic Studies. Literature Compass, 5(2), 424–434. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-4113.2008.00529.x

Jones, C. (2009). British Romanticism and Animals. Literature Compass, 6(1), 136–152. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-4113.2008.00597.x

Kaya, H. (2020). The Recurrent Metaphors in English Romantic Poetry: An Ecocritical Rereading of Wordsworth, Coleridge, Shelley, and Keats. Al-Farabi International Journal on Social Sciences, 5(3), 30–39. https://doi.org/10.46291/al-farabi.050303

Magee, P. (2021). Romantic notions of creativity now. Text, 25(Special 64). https://doi.org/10.52086/001c.30988

Nersessian, A. (2017). Romantic Ecocriticism Lately. Literature Compass, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/lic3.12433

Öztürk, S. (2024). William Wordsworth’s Preface to Lyrical Ballads: A Comparative Analysis of Classical Ideas and Matthew Arnold. Kare, (18), 58-70. https://doi.org/10.38060/kare.1393053

Roy, S. (2024). "The Influence of Romanticism on the Poetry of William Wordsworth and Samuel Taylor Coleridge". Innovative Research Thoughts, 10(4), 80–83. https://doi.org/10.36676/irt.v10.i4.1541

Sharma, L. (2022). Supremacy of Imagination in Romantic Poetry. Global Academic Journal of Linguistics and Literature, 4(1), 19–23. https://doi.org/10.36348/gajll.2022.v04i01.003

Trotter, D. (2023). The Ecstasy of Messaging: Coleridge's Natural Telegraphy. Critical Quarterly, 65(3), 4–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/criq.12740

Ulmer, W. (2009). Radical Similarity: Wordsworth, Coleridge, and the Dejection Dialogue. Elh, 76(1), 189-213. https://doi.org/10.1353/elh.0.0033

Wang, Y. (2025). Ecological Consciousness in British Romantic Poetry: A Case Study of Wordsworth and Coleridge’s Lyrical Ballads. SHS Web of Conferences, 222, 05012. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202522205012